\n

A terrific panel of artists, copyright experts, and museum people in a debate about contemporary art, digital media, and rights issues.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

In this debate, we discussed perspectives and challenges in using Creative Commons licenses on contemporary art, as opposed to traditional copyright. Does it entail increased visibility for artists if they share reproductions of their work more liberally than copyright allows for? Is it even possible for artists to opt out of social media today, if they want their work to known more widely? Are there new ways for artists to make revenues in connection with more openly licensed images of their work? Or is it a slippery slope to start relaxing the restrictions on how images of artworks are shown, shared and circulated online?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The aim was to have a constructive and solution-oriented debate that will help artists and cultural institutions alike to better understand how to navigate and benefit from the participatory culture on the Internet, while respecting rights.<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

The panel<\/strong><\/div>\n

\n

\n
• Filip Vest, artist<\/a><\/li>\n
• Peter Ravn, artist<\/a><\/li>\n
• Mathilde Schytz Marvit, Head of Digital Productions, SMK<\/a><\/li>\n
• Henrik Chulu, Creative Commons expert<\/a><\/li>\n
• Bo Tieldal, legal advisor, CopyDan\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
  \n

  IT lawyer Martin von Haller Gr\u00f8nb\u00e6k, Bird & Bird<\/a>, will moderate the debate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

  <\/div>\n

  \n

  <\/a>